Unmasking The Global Warming Hoax

[ODR India]

For decades, the narrative of catastrophic global warming driven by human CO2 emissions has been pushed as undeniable truth, but a closer examination reveals it as a carefully constructed deception. As detailed in Unmasking the Global Warming Hoax, this hoax originated from misinterpretations of early research, shifting from geoengineering efforts to warm the Arctic to alarmist claims that justify carbon taxes and manipulative technologies. The United Nations has perpetuated this lie for nearly 50 years, relying on presumptions rather than evidence, as exposed in UN Blatantly Lied About Global Warming.

The so-called 97% scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming is one of the biggest myths, with only 1.6% of papers explicitly endorsing that humans cause over 50% of observed warming. This fabrication, debunked in Global Warming Hoax, stems from flawed studies like Cook et al. (2013), where neutral or skeptical papers were misclassified to inflate agreement. Scientists like Craig Idso and Nir Shaviv have protested these misrepresentations, highlighting how the narrative ignores natural drivers like solar activity.

Historical climate cycles show that Earth’s temperature fluctuations are natural, driven by solar variations and orbital changes, not solely fossil fuels. The scam exploits these cycles for economic gain, imposing policies that infringe on human rights and enrich elites, as argued in Global Warming Scam. Failed predictions, such as ice-free Arctics or submerged nations by 2000, further prove the pseudoscience behind it.

Institutional biases fuel this deception, with funding directed toward alarmist research while suppressing dissent. As outlined in Funding Biases, scandals like Climategate reveal data manipulation to enforce an artificial consensus. Similarly, Fake Science frames climate change as a prime example of fabricated claims, using tactics like coerced peer reviews to maintain control.

The claim of “settled science” is another tool to silence opposition, ignoring historical shifts in scientific understanding. In Settled Science, parallels are drawn to past dogmas that were later overturned, underscoring how climate narratives suppress alternative views.

Even mainstream sources acknowledge the exaggeration; climate change is not an existential crisis, as explained in Why Climate Change Is Not Existential. The IPCC does not link it to apocalyptic outcomes, yet Mockingbird Media hype creates fatalism. Economic critiques in Climate Finance Critique question the overstated risks, suggesting policies are driven by profit rather than science.

See Unmasking The Global Warming Hoax: The Truth Behind Climate Change Lies post for more.

[Author]

Posts