- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 months, 2 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
The PRPRL, or Peer-Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature scam, operates by reinterpreting existing studies to fabricate overwhelming support for unproven theories. In this layered deception, neutral or skeptical papers on topics like solar influences are forcibly categorized as endorsements of human-caused warming, inflating apparent consensus from a mere 0.3% to 97%. For instance, mechanisms such as misclassification twist research on cosmic rays into backing CO2 dominance, while funding gatekeeping directs billions toward alarmist agendas, starving investigations into natural variability. Coerced reviews and data tampering, like the infamous “hide the decline” in tree-ring proxies, further erode integrity, as seen in the 1995 IPCC report alterations denounced as Peer-Review Corruption. Scientists like Nir Shaviv and Craig Idso have publicly disavowed their inclusions in such reviews, highlighting how rater bias and selective processes create an illusory unanimity. This scam not only undermines scientific discourse but also amplifies media narratives that bury dissent, turning objective inquiry into a tool for control.
See PRPRL Scam Of Global Warming Hoax for more.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.