The Dangerous Global Warming Hoax Exposed

Home Forums Fake Science, Hoaxes, Plandemics, And PsyOps The Dangerous Global Warming Hoax Exposed

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1650
    ODR India
    Keymaster

    The Dangerous Global Warming Hoax Exposed

    In an age where misinformation proliferates at unprecedented speeds, the narrative of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming stands as one of the most pervasive and damaging deceptions, orchestrated to centralise power, extract wealth through mechanisms like carbon taxes, and suppress genuine environmental discourse. This elaborate hoax, sustained for over five decades, distracts from natural climate dynamics while channeling trillions into futile initiatives that enrich elites and burden the masses. As international summits like COP30 perpetuate the global warming hoax, an informed public is awakening, rejecting these fabricated crises and demanding evidence-based accountability. Rooted in manipulated data and unfulfilled apocalyptic prophecies, this scam erodes scientific trust and diverts resources from real threats such as volcanic activity or biosecurity failures, all while posing tangible dangers through risky geoengineering and economic disruptions.

    The origins of this deception hark back to mid-20th-century ideas that initially viewed warming as beneficial, with pre-1962 proposals to melt Arctic ice via black soot for enhanced agriculture and habitability, treating CO2 as a helpful agent against cooling. However, Roger Revelle’s 1963 findings shifted the paradigm, deeming natural CO2 sufficient and flipping the script to warn of unintended warming. By the 1970s, organisations like the United Nations amplified unproven hypotheses, morphing regional weather anomalies into a global emergency while sidelining natural factors like solar cycles and orbital variations. This narrative, dissected in exposes of the obvious global warming hoax, has fueled a multibillion-dollar industry for nearly 50 years, funding hazardous geoengineering that risks ecosystem collapse far beyond any modest temperature shifts.

    Central to this fabrication is the illusion of a 97-99% scientific consensus on CO2 as the dominant warming driver, a statistic touted by figures like Barack Obama and John Kerry but derived from flawed studies such as Cook et al. (2013), which inflated endorsements through ambiguous categorisations. In reality, only 1.6% of papers explicitly linked over 50% of the 0.8°C warming over 150 years to humans, with explicit support dropping to 0.3% upon reanalysis by Richard Tol, exposing biases and misclassifications. Over 100 scientists, including Craig Idso on CO2’s greening effects and Nir Shaviv on cosmic rays, have rejected these distortions, as cataloged in critiques from Popular Technology. This consensus myth, unraveled by the Analytics Wing of Sovereign P4LO, stems from pragmatic public record audits rather than skewed peer reviews and PRPRL Scam, revealing no true majority deeming CO2 an existential threat but instead a tool for control and funding.

    This divide among experts is stark, with affirmers like James Hansen claiming fossil fuels drive extreme weather, countered by deniers such as William Happer who view CO2’s impact as saturated and advantageous. Richard Lindzen emphasises natural variability’s dominance, while Roy Spencer critiques inflated models. Satellite records indicate 0.13°C cooling from 1979-1994 and Arctic declines of 0.88°C over 50 years, contradicting polar myths, as argued by Willie Soon and Henrik Svensmark who stress solar and cosmic influences. Judith Curry, John Christy, and Patrick Moore assert cycles explain most changes, with CO2 aiding agriculture, and Bjorn Lomborg critiques mitigation costs outweighing benefits. Over 50 American Meteorological Society members in 1992 warned of uncertain policies, while Nobelists Ivar Giaever and John Clauser decry it as religion and unreliable modeling. This schism, hidden by “settled science” rhetoric, appears in doctored IPCC reports, as criticized by Frederick Seitz.

    No aspect sustains the hoax like the cadre of global warming doomsdayers, whose apocalyptic forecasts consistently fail, exposing pseudoscience fueled by fear. From Kenneth Watt’s 1970 prediction of an 11-degree colder world by 2000 to Noel Brown’s 1989 warning of nations vanishing by 2000, over 41 prophecies have yielded no complete fulfillments. Al Gore’s 2008 ice-free Arctic by 2013 remains icy seasonally, James Hansen’s 1988 submerged highways persist, John Kerry’s 2013 “500 days to chaos” passed uneventfully, and AOC’s 2019 “12 years to end” approaches without apocalypse. Partial alignments, like intensified storms, lack catastrophic scale, underscoring a pattern where hysteria secures funding—from Kyoto’s squandered billions to the Green New Deal’s $93 trillion fantasy. Echoing 1970s cooling alarms, this ignores CO2’s benefits per Idso’s studies and Climategate’s manipulations.

    See The Dangerous Global Warming Hoax Exposed By The Great Truth Revolution Of 2025 for more.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.