- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 months, 2 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
The letter by Gregory Gardner highlights statements from over 50 members of the American Meteorological Society who do not agree that catastrophic global warming follows from burning fossil fuels. Frederick Seitz described alterations to a 1995 report as a corruption of the peer-review process. Data cited by Robert C. Balling shows satellite measurements of cooling between 1979 and 1994 and Arctic temperature drops over 50 years. Public statements listed in the tables show individual scientists presenting positions on CO2’s role in global warming, with some affirming causation and others denying it, including through emphasis on solar activity as a driver. Scientists have also challenged classifications of their work in studies analyzing peer-reviewed literature.
Far from 97-99% scientific consensus, it seems to be a case of majority of climate scientists and other scientist considering Global Warming a hoax and PsyOp that is using Psychological tricks to fool people and gain funding.
See Global Warming Divide: Scientists Clash Over CO2’s True Impact for more.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.