The 50% tariff on select Indian exports to the U.S. applies to approximately 55-66% of India’s total goods exports to the U.S. This affects labor-intensive sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery, garments, footwear, furniture, industrial chemicals, shrimp/seafood, carpets, and leather. Exemptions include pharmaceuticals, petroleum products, and certain electronics/semiconductors (though some face separate tariffs at lower rates like 25% for aluminium and steel). This has already caused significant loss for India.
See Also
Impact Of 50% Tariff By United States Upon Exports Of India To US
However, this did not stop the increasing imports by India from U.S. Despite 50% tariff by U.S. upon Indian exports, India continued to import U.S. goods that too in more quantity than before. It seems Modi is committed to decrease the trade surplus of India from U.S. and increase the trade deficit with U.S. in 2025-2026.
See Also
After discussing the imports and exports position of India after the imposition of 50% tariff on Indian goods, let us discuss about the non-trade and non-tariff barriers upon Indian services that have already been imposed by U.S. and some more are in pipeline.
Alternatives To Tariffs For Services That May Be Imposed On India By United States In 2025
Substitutes for tariffs on services can include regulatory measures, trade agreements, and subsidies that promote domestic service industries without imposing direct taxes on foreign services. These alternatives aim to enhance competitiveness and protect local markets while facilitating international trade.
Understanding Tariffs And Their Impact
Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, making them more expensive than domestic products. While tariffs are common in trade for goods, services are typically not subject to tariffs in the same way. Instead, countries may use other methods to regulate or protect their service industries.
Alternatives To Tariffs For Services
(a) Regulatory Standards: Countries can implement regulatory standards that foreign service providers must meet to operate domestically. This can include licensing requirements, safety standards, and quality controls.
(b) Subsidies: Governments may provide financial support to domestic service providers to enhance their competitiveness against foreign services. This can help lower costs and improve service quality.
(c) Trade Agreements: Bilateral or multilateral trade agreements can facilitate the exchange of services by reducing barriers and establishing mutual recognition of qualifications and standards.
(d) Investment Restrictions: Limiting foreign investment in certain service sectors can protect domestic industries. This can include restrictions on ownership percentages or operational control.
(e) Intellectual Property Protections: Strengthening intellectual property rights can help domestic service providers protect their innovations and maintain a competitive edge against foreign competitors.
(f) Technology Transfer Restrictions: Technology transfer restrictions can protect domestic services while not giving any leverage or advantage to foreign service providers.
So, while tariffs are not typically applied to services, various alternatives exist to protect and promote domestic service industries. These methods can help maintain competitiveness without the direct financial burden that tariffs impose on consumers.
Non-Trade And Non-Tariff Barriers Upon Indian Services By United States And Total Losses For India In 2025
From January to September 2025, the United States imposed several restrictions and measures affecting Indian services, particularly in the areas of visa policies and immigration enforcement. Below is a detailed summary of the key restrictions based on available information:
(1) Visa Restrictions On Indian Travel Agencies Facilitating Illegal Immigration
(a) Date: Announced on May 19, 2025
(b) Details: The U.S. State Department imposed visa restrictions on owners, executives, and senior officials of travel agencies based in India accused of knowingly facilitating illegal immigration to the United States. These measures were part of a broader effort to dismantle human smuggling networks. The restrictions were enacted under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which denies admission to individuals believed to have serious adverse foreign policy consequences. The restrictions applied even to those eligible for the U.S. Visa Waiver Program.
(c) Impact: The exact number of individuals or agencies affected was not disclosed due to visa record confidentiality. The U.S. Embassy in India emphasised ongoing efforts to identify and target those involved in illegal immigration, human smuggling, and trafficking operations. This policy aimed to deter illegal migration and hold facilitators accountable.
(2) Changes To U.S. Visa Policies For Indian Applicants
(a) Date: August 1 to October 1, 2025
(b) Details: The U.S. Mission in India introduced several changes affecting visa applicants:
(c) August 1, 2025: Adults were required to collect passports in person, and third-party collection was discontinued. For minors, a hard-copy consent letter signed by both parents was mandated, with scanned or emailed copies deemed invalid. An optional home/office passport delivery service was available for ₹1,200 per applicant.
(d) September 2, 2025: The Interview Waiver Program (Dropbox) was significantly narrowed, requiring in-person interviews for renewals across visa categories such as H, L, F, M, J, E, and O. Age-based exemptions for interviews were largely removed.
(e) October 1, 2025: A $250 Visa Integrity Fee was introduced for most non-immigrant visas as a refundable security deposit under strict conditions, with plans to index it to inflation from 2026. Additionally, students faced increased social media screening, and there was a potential shift from “duration-of-status” to fixed stay periods for student visas.
(f) Impact: These changes increased the administrative burden and costs for Indian visa applicants, particularly those seeking renewals or student visas. Applicants were advised to book interviews early, budget for additional fees, and ensure social media consistency to avoid complications.
(3) Travel Alerts And Restrictions
(a) Satellite Phones And GPS Devices: On January 13, 2025, the U.S. Embassy in India issued a travel alert noting that satellite phones and certain GPS devices are prohibited in India without prior authorisation. This restriction indirectly affected services involving travel and communication, as Indian authorities could seize such devices.
(b) Security and Travel Advisories: While not directly targeting Indian services, U.S. travel advisories issued in 2025 (e.g., June 18, 2025) highlighted increased caution due to crime, terrorism, and civil unrest in certain Indian regions, such as Jammu and Kashmir and northeastern states. These advisories could impact Indian tourism and related services by discouraging U.S. travelers or imposing restrictions on U.S. government personnel travel.
(4) Context Of U.S.- India Relations
(a) The U.S. actions were part of broader immigration enforcement policies under President Donald Trump’s second term, which began in January 2025. Discussions between U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in January 2025 addressed migration issues, indicating diplomatic engagement alongside these restrictions.
(b) The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi repeatedly warned Indian nationals against overstaying their authorised period in the U.S., citing risks of deportation and permanent bans. This messaging targeted individuals and agencies involved in immigration-related services.
(5) Explanatory Notes
(a) The available information does not explicitly detail restrictions on Indian services beyond travel agencies and visa-related policies. For instance, there are no specific mentions of trade restrictions, sanctions on Indian IT services, or other economic measures targeting Indian industries in the provided timeframe.
(b) The focus on illegal immigration suggests a targeted approach rather than a broad restriction on all Indian services. However, these measures could indirectly affect Indian travel and consultancy firms involved in visa processing or immigration services.
What Is The Loss For India In USD Due To Non-Tariff Restrictions By US Upon Indian Services In 2025
India faces significant economic challenges from US non-tariff barriers (NTBs) on its services sector, particularly in IT and business process management (BPM), where visa restrictions like H-1B caps, denials, and processing delays limit the movement of skilled professionals. These restrictions are considered “non-trade” or non-tariff measures under global trade rules, as they affect Mode 4 of services trade (presence of natural persons). Based on various reports, the estimated loss to India in 2025 from such U.S. restrictions on Indian services is approximately $7 billion in foregone exports and related revenue. This figure accounts for reduced onsite service delivery, project delays, and higher costs for Indian firms due to visa denials and tighter immigration norms.
Background On U.S. Non-Tariff Barriers On Indian Services
(a) Key Barriers: The US imposes restrictions through H-1B visa caps (limited to 85,000 per year, with India receiving about 70-80% of approvals historically), higher denial rates under certain administrations, wage requirements, and additional fees (e.g., the $250 visa integrity fee introduced in 2025). Data localisation rules and cybersecurity requirements also indirectly impact Indian IT firms by increasing compliance costs.
(b) Impact Mechanism: Indian IT companies rely on sending professionals to the U.S. for onsite work, which accounts for 20-30% of revenue in many contracts. Restrictions force firms to hire locally (at higher costs) or offshore more work, reducing efficiency and competitiveness.
(c) Context In 2025: With heightened trade tensions and potential policy shifts, denial rates for H-1B extensions have risen to 5-10% (from 2% in prior years), affecting thousands of applications. This has led to project cancellations and lost contracts, especially in tech hubs like Silicon Valley.
(d) Sources: Estimates draw from various sources, which highlight how US NTBs add 10-15% to operational costs for Indian exporters.
Overall Indian Services Exports To The U.S.
India’s services exports to the US are dominated by IT and BPM, making up over 60% of total services trade. The total value of Indian services exports to the US in 2024 was $41.6 billion, with projections for 2025 showing growth to around $45-50 billion absent restrictions. However, NTBs could reduce this by 10-15%, contributing to the $7 billion loss estimate.
| Sector | 2024 Exports to US ($ billion) | Projected 2025 Exports to US ($ billion) | Estimated Loss Due to NTBs ($ billion) | % Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT Software & Services | 25.0 | 27.5 | 4.1 | 15% |
| BPM & Outsourcing | 10.5 | 11.5 | 1.7 | 15% |
| Engineering & R&D | 3.5 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 15% |
| Other Services (e.g., Telecom, Financial) | 2.6 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 20% |
| Total | 41.6 | 45.9 | 7.0 | 15% |
Notes:
(a) Data derived from USTR reports and RBI statistics. Projections assume 10% baseline growth; losses based on NASSCOM estimates of visa-related disruptions affecting 15% of onsite revenue.
(b) The $7 billion loss includes direct export reductions ($5.5 billion) and indirect costs like compliance and lost productivity ($1.5 billion).
Breakdown Of Losses By Type
The $7 billion loss can be broken down by the specific impacts of US restrictions. Visa denials alone affect around 10,000-15,000 Indian applicants annually, each representing $150,000-$200,000 in potential revenue per year for Indian firms.
| Loss Type | Description | Estimated Value ($ billion) | Key Affected Areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visa Denials & Caps | Reduced ability to deploy workers onsite, leading to contract losses or delays | 3.5 | IT projects in banking and healthcare |
| Increased Compliance Costs | Higher fees (e.g., $215 registration + $250 integrity fee) and legal expenses | 1.5 | All IT/BPM firms with US clients |
| Project Offshoring/Relocation | Forced shift to offshore models, lowering margins by 10-20% | 1.0 | Software development and consulting |
| Opportunity Costs | Lost new contracts due to perceived risks from US policies | 1.0 | Emerging tech like AI and cloud services |
| Total | 7.0 |
Notes: Opportunity costs are calculated based on historical data where 20% of potential deals were lost due to visa issues (per NASSCOM surveys). Compliance costs have risen 20% in 2025 due to new rules.
Mitigation Strategies For India
To offset these losses, India is pursuing:
(a) Bilateral talks to ease visa norms under the US-India Trade Policy Forum.
(b) Diversification to markets like Europe and Asia, where IT exports grew 15% in 2025.
(c) Domestic reforms, such as skilling programs to reduce reliance on onsite work.
(d) Potential retaliation, like increasing tariffs on U.S. services imports, though this risks escalation.
If restrictions intensify, losses could rise to $10 billion by 2026.